Counter Cyclical Program in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,080
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $34,083,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas C Stewart,james G Stewart & Stephen G Gunn | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $141,495 |
| 2 | Alden Rose Farms Inc | Connersville, IN 47331 | $108,941 |
| 3 | Doerstler Farms | Greens Fork, IN 47345 | $102,328 |
| 4 | Dieckmann Livestock & Grain | Osgood, IN 47037 | $101,506 |
| 5 | Jordan Farms | Eaton, OH 45320 | $92,723 |
| 6 | Decatur Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $90,892 |
| 7 | B G Reiger Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $88,170 |
| 8 | Ertel Farms Inc | Osgood, IN 47037 | $84,621 |
| 9 | William E Smith | Rushville, IN 46173 | $84,431 |
| 10 | Nancy C Smith | Rushville, IN 46173 | $84,431 |
| 11 | Knollman Farm Partnership | Liberty, IN 47353 | $81,318 |
| 12 | Ron Coffman | Liberty, IN 47353 | $80,131 |
| 13 | Kopp Brothers Partnership | Harrison, OH 45030 | $78,300 |
| 14 | Starr Farms Partnership, Inc | Connersville, IN 47331 | $78,154 |
| 15 | Ortman's Grain & Livestock Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $76,548 |
| 16 | Randall E Pitts | Hagerstown, IN 47346 | $76,160 |
| 17 | Village Creek Farms LLC | Connersville, IN 47331 | $75,609 |
| 18 | Ag Production Ent Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $73,486 |
| 19 | B & J Krieger Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $71,721 |
| 20 | Tomson Farms Inc | Westport, IN 47283 | $71,364 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf