Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26,601
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $333,481,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spring Creek Family Farms | Wamego, KS 66547 | $797,754 |
| 2 | Brookover Land Ent Lp | Garden City, KS 67846 | $657,884 |
| 3 | Fairleigh Corp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $638,039 |
| 4 | Premium Feeders | Scandia, KS 66966 | $636,382 |
| 5 | Henry Pork, LLC | Longford, KS 67458 | $522,905 |
| 6 | Hatcher Land & Cattle Co | Liberal, KS 67901 | $516,042 |
| 7 | Cow Camp Inc | Ramona, KS 67475 | $514,978 |
| 8 | R & P Cattle Jv | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $510,086 |
| 9 | R C Geven Farms LLC | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $500,000 |
| 10 | Carpenter Cattle Co Inc | Brewster, KS 67732 | $500,000 |
| 11 | Kohman Dairy LLC | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $500,000 |
| 12 | Reynolds & Reynolds Cattle LLC | Abilene, KS 67410 | $500,000 |
| 13 | Livestock Services Inc | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $500,000 |
| 14 | Doll Land And Cattle Inc | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $500,000 |
| 15 | Cott Family Farms | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $481,216 |
| 16 | Poky Feeders Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $473,521 |
| 17 | Hilker Family Limited Partnership | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $473,178 |
| 18 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $472,159 |
| 19 | Meyer Land And Cattle Co | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $468,435 |
| 20 | Homestead Farms | Wallace, KS 67761 | $463,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf