Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 12,307

Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $45,508,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs
1995-2021
1Frontier Dairy LLCSyracuse, KS 67878$119,452
2Triple T Farms Dba Tate Cattle CompanyLakin, KS 67860$104,755
3James Theron Culwell Trust No 1Saint Francis, KS 67756$91,591
4Circle 3 Ranch IncKirwin, KS 67644$74,615
5Irsik Family PartnershipGarden City, KS 67846$70,161
6Triangle H Grain & Cattle CoGarden City, KS 67846$70,138
7Loyd Moore IncOberlin, KS 67749$63,092
8Jean Holmes Mcdonald Life EstateFairway, KS 66205$62,377
9Adams Cattle CoPlains, KS 67869$61,465
10Gary V JohnsonDwight, KS 66849$60,861
11Pakkebier Farms LLCDensmore, KS 67645$60,383
12Michael W KoughRussell Springs, KS 67764$60,045
13Bernard J OttleyOakley, KS 67748$58,561
14Ferguson Zy Farms IncKensington, KS 66951$58,432
15Kevin GantWilsey, KS 66873$56,741
16Liberty RanchPlainville, KS 67663$56,052
17Spring Creek Ranch IncAlmena, KS 67622$55,075
18Darrel J LundgrenGove, KS 67736$55,020
19B-k Cox Farms IncLong Island, KS 67647$54,350
20Brenton R PhillipsSelden, KS 67757$54,052

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag