Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,979

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $13,502,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21Duff Land & Cattle IncScott City, KS 67871$54,073
22Carroll R Adams IncClay Center, KS 67432$53,463
23Cecil W MilhonLiberal, KS 67901$53,328
24Big D Farms IncManhattan, KS 66502$53,210
255-k Farms LLCArkansas City, KS 67005$50,489
26Joyce Kriegh TrustGoodland, KS 67735$50,331
27Edward A SchneiderKanopolis, KS 67454$49,607
28Gordon WinfreyPlains, KS 67869$49,533
29Troy D CarlgrenCourtland, KS 66939$47,603
30John A David TrustLenora, KS 67645$46,290
31Darrell A CarlsonCourtland, KS 66939$46,056
32Randy SchwartzGreat Bend, KS 67530$46,039
33Timothy M MartinClay Center, KS 67432$45,905
34Gene ShuckLiberal, KS 67901$45,766
35Edward W WhiteMoscow, KS 67952$45,504
36T-bone Farms IncGoodland, KS 67735$45,033
37Brian HemphillClay Center, KS 67432$44,205
38J & M Georg IncRush Center, KS 67575$43,853
39Paul MoranAlexander, KS 67513$43,772
40Burton & Artha Griffey FarmsHays, KS 67601$43,490

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag