Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,979

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $13,502,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2021
1Hrc Feed Yards IncScott City, KS 67871$265,628
2Duke E MarrsFowler, KS 67844$123,401
3George E AtwoodElkhart, KS 67950$98,661
4Patrick M TownsendGoodland, KS 67735$91,037
5G & J FundCopeland, KS 67837$87,238
6Cox FarmsSublette, KS 67877$85,013
7Garden City CompanyGarden City, KS 67846$75,375
8Marvin J RichmeierGarden City, KS 67846$75,196
9Stonington FarmsManter, KS 67862$73,149
10William T Seyb Revocable TrustJohnson, KS 67855$73,007
11Curtis L SteenbockLongford, KS 67458$70,109
12Harlan D HouseGoodland, KS 67735$67,190
13James J O'dellWestminster, CO 80234$65,260
14Dennis - Dennis E Ho E HouseGreen Cove Springs, FL 32043$61,590
15Rick L BrentLoveland, CO 80538$61,285
16Mark CopenhaverFowler, KS 67844$58,119
17Don W SchellBeaver, OK 73932$58,053
18B & L Grain Farms IncGarden City, KS 67846$56,040
19Clinton L Stalker JrSatanta, KS 67870$55,887
20K & C Janzen Irrev TrustScott City, KS 67871$55,137

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag