Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 594

Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $1,498,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP)
1995-2021
1David L Ellison & Amelia K Roeder Joint Rvoc TrustHumboldt, KS 66748$51,686
2Dunbar Farms IncPrinceton, KS 66078$30,107
3John J LucianColumbus, KS 66725$23,705
4Kenneth W RenyerWestphalia, KS 66093$18,290
5Tanner A NitcherPomona, KS 66076$16,539
6Jack A Davis Living TrustPrinceton, KS 66078$16,142
7Stephens Farm & Ranch LLCMoran, KS 66755$15,723
8Brian ComstockFort Scott, KS 66701$15,660
9Mary M Hall TrustGreeley, KS 66033$15,557
10Lafe W WilsonUniontown, KS 66779$14,475
11Smilin D Farms IncLacygne, KS 66040$13,583
12Kenneth Laymon And Regina Laymon TrustNeosho Falls, KS 66758$13,411
13Joseph H And Bernita M Berntsen Living TrustLa Harpe, KS 66751$13,389
14Travis Ryan KimreyEdna, KS 67342$13,095
15C Michael And Brooka D Landrith Living TrustBartlett, KS 67332$13,071
16Fred Kopp Family Trust - Fred KoppFairview, KS 66425$12,878
17Charly CummingsYates Center, KS 66783$12,811
18Ivan Clark JrTroy, KS 66087$12,380
19Charles Curtis Slyter Dba Slyter Cattle CoPaola, KS 66071$11,594
20Corpstein FarmsAtchison, KS 66002$10,906

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag