Total Conservation Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 397
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $626,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert & Alice Headley Liv Trust | Wellington, KS 67152 | $3,692 |
42 | Dennis Barker | Attica, KS 67009 | $3,659 |
43 | Daryl Laroy Hopkins Revocable Trust-daryl Laroy Ho | Gentry, AR 72734 | $3,656 |
44 | Bernard & Ida Sylvana Lies Family Lp | Wichita, KS 67230 | $3,652 |
45 | Thomas Mitchell | South Haven, KS 67140 | $3,606 |
46 | Allan Helsel | South Haven, KS 67140 | $3,566 |
47 | William P Saguto | Mulvane, KS 67110 | $3,504 |
48 | , | $3,446 | |
49 | Judy A Roberts | Caldwell, KS 67022 | $3,308 |
50 | , | $3,303 | |
51 | Ronald L Rogers Revocable Trust | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $3,300 |
52 | Richard C Johnson | Norwich, KS 67118 | $3,196 |
53 | Janet A Curtis | South Hutchinson, KS 67505 | $3,190 |
54 | , | $3,179 | |
55 | Howard Wm Strickland | South Haven, KS 67140 | $3,177 |
56 | Lois E Austin Trust | South Haven, KS 67140 | $3,141 |
57 | Robert D Austin Trust | South Haven, KS 67140 | $3,141 |
58 | Edwin V Miller | Kalona, IA 52247 | $3,094 |
59 | Kim E La Count | Harper, KS 67058 | $3,035 |
60 | Paul M Betzen Revocable Trust | Geuda Springs, KS 67051 | $3,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”