Total Conservation Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,005

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $84,225,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Cordelia O ReynoldsFlorence, OR 97439$263,852
22Short Farms IncOxford, KS 67119$260,613
23Mable E DavisSouth Hutchinson, KS 67505$260,081
24Anna Lou EinselColdwater, KS 67029$257,843
25Sandra Lee BellSpringfield, MO 65804$250,933
26Ralph L Arnet Revocable Trust-ralph L ArnetWaldron, KS 67150$250,630
27Short Land Company LLCOxford, KS 67119$242,826
28C Dean BertholfAnthony, KS 67003$241,443
29Daum-comanche CorporationHutchinson, KS 67504$241,000
30Dennis BarkerAttica, KS 67009$239,791
31Rick E Chitwood & Margareta I Chitwood Liv TrMayfield, KS 67103$239,018
32Dennis L Albright And Marilyn S Albright Liv TrAttica, KS 67009$235,947
33Harold HughbanksAttica, KS 67009$233,720
34Scott M Circle Living TrustMulvane, KS 67110$230,815
35Rush Creek LLCAnthony, KS 67003$227,176
36George Herrmann Revocable TrustFord, KS 67842$226,503
37Sonkabob IncAnthony, KS 67003$224,485
38Charles - Inslee Liv M InsleeSharon, KS 67138$224,238
39David CaryColdwater, KS 67029$224,213
40Steven Ray HollandErick, OK 73645$224,154

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag