Conservation Reserve Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,783
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $369,606,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hard Bargain Farms Partnership | Epps, LA 71237 | $2,094,046 |
| 2 | Banks Farm Partnership | Mangham, LA 71259 | $1,835,757 |
| 3 | East Carroll Parish School Board | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,825,371 |
| 4 | Whatley's Four Oaks Partnership | Denham Springs, LA 70726 | $1,817,417 |
| 5 | Petrus Brothers Realty | West Monroe, LA 71294 | $1,656,023 |
| 6 | Teer Burks Teer | Shreveport, LA 71135 | $1,132,486 |
| 7 | Duty Ferry Farm Inc | Monroe, LA 71211 | $1,041,658 |
| 8 | The Benjamin Meek Littlepage And Kathryn Wright Li | Colfax, LA 71417 | $1,033,001 |
| 9 | Terral Farms Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,023,975 |
| 10 | Big Bend Plantation Inc Of La | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $970,063 |
| 11 | Linwood Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $933,095 |
| 12 | Prince Farms Inc | Start, LA 71279 | $921,453 |
| 13 | Salt Lake Farm Partnership | Monroe, LA 71201 | $905,663 |
| 14 | Green Gold Company | Independence, LA 70443 | $892,153 |
| 15 | Biedco Corporation | Monroe, LA 71211 | $889,613 |
| 16 | Rodney And Dania Hutchins | Harrisonburg, LA 71340 | $874,299 |
| 17 | Thom Enterprises Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $857,957 |
| 18 | The Teal Partnership L P | Monroe, LA 71201 | $855,090 |
| 19 | T Ranch Inc | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $852,297 |
| 20 | Bird LLC | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $840,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf