Conservation Reserve Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,324
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $413,855,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hard Bargain Farms Partnership | Epps, LA 71237 | $2,094,046 |
2 | Whatley's Four Oaks Partnership | Denham Springs, LA 70726 | $2,081,329 |
3 | Banks Farm Partnership | Mangham, LA 71259 | $2,054,005 |
4 | Petrus Brothers Realty | West Monroe, LA 71294 | $1,866,749 |
5 | East Carroll Parish School Board | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,825,371 |
6 | Balmoral Farming Partnership | Newellton, LA 71357 | $1,319,465 |
7 | Teer Burks Teer | Shreveport, LA 71135 | $1,264,916 |
8 | Salt Lake Farm Partnership | Monroe, LA 71201 | $1,157,279 |
9 | Duty Ferry Farm Inc | Monroe, LA 71211 | $1,141,658 |
10 | The Benjamin Meek Littlepage And Kathryn Wright Li | Colfax, LA 71417 | $1,118,219 |
11 | Big Bend Plantation Inc Of La | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $1,094,072 |
12 | Terral Farms Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,070,039 |
13 | Prince Farms Inc | Start, LA 71279 | $1,021,453 |
14 | Linwood Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,003,232 |
15 | Green Gold Company | Independence, LA 70443 | $995,409 |
16 | Biedco Corporation | Monroe, LA 71211 | $964,190 |
17 | Thom Enterprises Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $957,957 |
18 | The Teal Partnership L P | Monroe, LA 71201 | $955,090 |
19 | Butts Family Limited Partnership | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $926,380 |
20 | C & G Of Winnsboro Inc | Monroe, LA 71201 | $917,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>