Conservation Reserve Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,324

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $413,855,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
1Hard Bargain Farms PartnershipEpps, LA 71237$2,094,046
2Whatley's Four Oaks PartnershipDenham Springs, LA 70726$2,081,329
3Banks Farm PartnershipMangham, LA 71259$2,054,005
4Petrus Brothers RealtyWest Monroe, LA 71294$1,866,749
5East Carroll Parish School BoardLake Providence, LA 71254$1,825,371
6Balmoral Farming PartnershipNewellton, LA 71357$1,319,465
7Teer Burks TeerShreveport, LA 71135$1,264,916
8Salt Lake Farm PartnershipMonroe, LA 71201$1,157,279
9Duty Ferry Farm IncMonroe, LA 71211$1,141,658
10The Benjamin Meek Littlepage And Kathryn Wright LiColfax, LA 71417$1,118,219
11Big Bend Plantation Inc Of LaTallulah, LA 71284$1,094,072
12Terral Farms IncLake Providence, LA 71254$1,070,039
13Prince Farms IncStart, LA 71279$1,021,453
14Linwood PartnershipSaint Joseph, LA 71366$1,003,232
15Green Gold CompanyIndependence, LA 70443$995,409
16Biedco CorporationMonroe, LA 71211$964,190
17Thom Enterprises IncLake Providence, LA 71254$957,957
18The Teal Partnership L PMonroe, LA 71201$955,090
19Butts Family Limited PartnershipNew Braunfels, TX 78130$926,380
20C & G Of Winnsboro IncMonroe, LA 71201$917,508

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag