Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $995,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Pine Island Farm PartnershipSheffield, MA 01257$322,445
2Maple Shade Farm IncSheffield, MA 01257$119,616
3Fairfields Dairy Farm LLCWilliamstown, MA 01267$109,184
4Larkin Farm LLCSheffield, MA 01257$84,582
5Twin River Farm LLCAshley Falls, MA 01222$65,252
6Turner Farms IncSouth Egremont, MA 01258$55,366
7Broadlawn FarmAdams, MA 01220$45,294
8Jayko DairyCheshire, MA 01225$35,028
9Chenail Brothers Dairy FarmWilliamstown, MA 01267$33,027
10Harley P. Phelps III Dba Echo FarmNew Ashford, MA 01237$22,076
11Tobey Hill Farm PartnershipSheffield, MA 01257$18,501
12Gary M ShepardWest Stockbridge, MA 01266$15,697
13Elmartin FarmCheshire, MA 01225$9,307
14Fred HavillTyringham, MA 01264$9,211
15Ioka Farm LLCHancock, MA 01237$9,000
16John GwozdzCheshire, MA 01225$7,346
17Windy Valley Limited PartnershipPittsfield, MA 01201$6,777
18George BeebeGreat Barrington, MA 01230$5,681
19North Plain Farm LLCGreat Barrington, MA 01230$5,402
20Edwin ClairmontCheshire, MA 01225$3,780

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag