Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $8,668 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
2021
1Ioka Farm LLCHancock, MA 01237$1,911
2Maple Shade Farm IncSheffield, MA 01257$1,182
3North Plain Farm LLCGreat Barrington, MA 01230$1,012
4Edwin ClairmontCheshire, MA 01225$975
5Windy Valley Limited PartnershipPittsfield, MA 01201$829
6Darryl Lipinski Dba Sweet Brook Beef CompanyWilliamstown, MA 01267$756
7Timothy Michael GallagherLanesborough, MA 01237$448
8Elmartin FarmCheshire, MA 01225$405
9Steven JenningsNew Ashford, MA 01237$275
10Pine Island Farm PartnershipSheffield, MA 01257$183
11Larkin Farm LLCSheffield, MA 01257$130
12Broadlawn FarmAdams, MA 01220$106
13Twin River Farm LLCAshley Falls, MA 01222$95
14Chenail Brothers Dairy FarmWilliamstown, MA 01267$65
15Tobey Hill Farm PartnershipSheffield, MA 01257$65
16Gary M ShepardWest Stockbridge, MA 01266$58
17Harley P. Phelps III Dba Echo FarmNew Ashford, MA 01237$51
18Jayko DairyCheshire, MA 01225$50
19Fairfields Dairy Farm LLCWilliamstown, MA 01267$44
20Turner Farms IncSouth Egremont, MA 01258$30

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag