Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 621
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $2,232,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dale Steimel | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $16,287 |
42 | Raymond J Omerza | Empire, MI 49630 | $15,907 |
43 | Jelinek Orchards Limited Liabilit | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $15,438 |
44 | Merillat Orchards LLC | Rapid City, MI 49676 | $15,400 |
45 | Alan Bakker | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $14,548 |
46 | Garden Orchards | Garden, MI 49835 | $14,296 |
47 | Hohnke & Sons Inc | Cedar, MI 49621 | $13,651 |
48 | Mark Ciarkowski | Posen, MI 49776 | $13,144 |
49 | James Empson Delete | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $12,436 |
50 | Harry Nugent | Benzonia, MI 49616 | $11,534 |
51 | Greg Williams | Cedar, MI 49621 | $10,817 |
52 | David B Kilcherman | Northport, MI 49670 | $10,428 |
53 | Stone & Sons | Beulah, MI 49617 | $9,962 |
54 | Steimel Brothers Farm | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $9,188 |
55 | Butler Potato Farm Inc | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $9,150 |
56 | William Johnson | Frankfort, MI 49635 | $8,899 |
57 | John A Elzinga | Charlevoix, MI 49720 | $8,765 |
58 | Daisy Pollister | Elk Rapids, MI 49629 | $8,313 |
59 | Versil M White | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $8,206 |
60 | Richard Bauer | Foster City, MI 49834 | $8,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”