Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 573

Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $2,199,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Miscellaneous Farm Programs
1995-2021
1Weaver Family Limited PartnershipNorthport, MI 49670$131,285
2Debacker Potato FarmCornell, MI 49818$92,963
3Stanek BrothersTraverse City, MI 49684$91,769
4Melvin G HollenbeckKewadin, MI 49648$83,334
5Jack Wendel GrayBenzonia, MI 49616$81,683
6Putney Beef Or Fruit IncBenzonia, MI 49616$71,057
7Evans Brothers Fruit CompanyFrankfort, MI 49635$70,698
8Fisher Properties Of Indiana IncLake Leelanau, MI 49653$69,463
9Twin Orr-chardsArcadia, MI 49613$60,738
10Henry Orchards IncBenzonia, MI 49616$58,499
11Amos Farms LLC Dorance M AmosWilliamsburg, MI 49690$55,117
12Cherry Bay Orchards IncSuttons Bay, MI 49682$51,372
13Eagle View FarmsLake Leelanau, MI 49653$50,845
14Michael J ParadisKewadin, MI 49648$49,683
15Friske Orchards, Inc.Charlevoix, MI 49720$47,688
16Burnette Foods IncEast Jordan, MI 49727$46,184
17Svf IncNorthport, MI 49670$45,450
18Interwater FarmsWilliamsburg, MI 49690$41,809
19Ronald MickFrankfort, MI 49635$35,507
20King Orchards Fruit LLCCentral Lake, MI 49622$34,094

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag