Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 128
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $406,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Revall | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $2,677 |
42 | Brent And Gerald Cottle | Pickford, MI 49774 | $2,616 |
43 | Nathan R Mitchell | Ossineke, MI 49766 | $2,576 |
44 | Scott Mellgren | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $2,415 |
45 | John Stachowicz | Vulcan, MI 49892 | $2,399 |
46 | Providence Farm LLC | Central Lake, MI 49622 | $2,381 |
47 | Bear Creek Organics LLC | Petoskey, MI 49770 | $2,290 |
48 | Donald Kozlowski | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $2,185 |
49 | La Casa Verde Produce, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $2,073 |
50 | Greg Greenman | East Jordan, MI 49727 | $1,968 |
51 | Curtis Patz | Wallace, MI 49893 | $1,946 |
52 | Todd Hemmingson | Herron, MI 49744 | $1,600 |
53 | Darrell Havelka | Wallace, MI 49893 | $1,600 |
54 | Brenda A Benson | Powers, MI 49874 | $1,590 |
55 | Terry L Perttula | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $1,552 |
56 | Dale C Forrester | Atlanta, MI 49709 | $1,538 |
57 | Vandermissen Farm | Wilson, MI 49896 | $1,507 |
58 | John Hill | Brimley, MI 49715 | $1,472 |
59 | Wilson Farm | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $1,470 |
60 | Second Spring Farm, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $1,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”