Margin Protection Program in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $26,422 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zarske Farm | Herron, MI 49744 | $1,906 |
| 2 | Getz-milk Dairy LLC | Wilson, MI 49896 | $612 |
| 3 | Kevin Richard | Hawks, MI 49743 | $598 |
| 4 | Skudlarek Dairy Farm LLC | Posen, MI 49776 | $596 |
| 5 | Johnson Farms LLC | Daggett, MI 49821 | $594 |
| 6 | Butterwerth Dairy Farm LLC | Alpena, MI 49707 | $594 |
| 7 | Lucas Dairy Farms LLC | Posen, MI 49776 | $594 |
| 8 | Werth Dairy LLC | Alpena, MI 49707 | $589 |
| 9 | Donald Budzinski | Cheboygan, MI 49721 | $583 |
| 10 | Taylor Creek Farm LLC | Pickford, MI 49774 | $583 |
| 11 | Russell Tolan | Ossineke, MI 49766 | $581 |
| 12 | Boss Dairy Farm Inc | Charlevoix, MI 49720 | $580 |
| 13 | Rich-lo Dairy Farms | Engadine, MI 49827 | $578 |
| 14 | Waucedah Hill Farm LLC | Vulcan, MI 49892 | $572 |
| 15 | Pleasant View Dairy Farm LLC | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $558 |
| 16 | Marsicek Farms LLC | Wilson, MI 49896 | $552 |
| 17 | Richard J Fettig | Petoskey, MI 49770 | $537 |
| 18 | Charles William Stanek | East Jordan, MI 49727 | $522 |
| 19 | David J Bell | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $492 |
| 20 | David Paul Granskog Farm | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $475 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf