CCC Organic Programs in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $22,567 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weaver Family Limited Partnership | Northport, MI 49670 | $1,000 |
| 2 | Matt Guindon | Cornell, MI 49818 | $990 |
| 3 | Lakeview Hills Organic Farm LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $987 |
| 4 | A&m Edgar Farm | Spruce, MI 48762 | $979 |
| 5 | Nathan R Mitchell | Ossineke, MI 49766 | $971 |
| 6 | Julie Martinson | Harbor Springs, MI 49740 | $900 |
| 7 | Dale C Forrester | Atlanta, MI 49709 | $750 |
| 8 | Far Hills Maple Syrup, LLC | Burt Lake, MI 49717 | $700 |
| 9 | Light Of Day Organics LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $692 |
| 10 | Todd Alan Foro | Trenary, MI 49891 | $675 |
| 11 | Coveyou Farms LLC | Petoskey, MI 49770 | $625 |
| 12 | Southwell Inc | Mancelona, MI 49659 | $625 |
| 13 | Levi D Forrester | Munising, MI 49862 | $625 |
| 14 | Ronald Rhynard | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $625 |
| 15 | La Casa Verde Produce, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $594 |
| 16 | Philip Deloria | Pellston, MI 49769 | $552 |
| 17 | Elmbrook Farms Ltd | Menominee, MI 49858 | $500 |
| 18 | Brent N Hiske | Alpena, MI 49707 | $500 |
| 19 | Bear Creek Organics LLC | Petoskey, MI 49770 | $500 |
| 20 | Second Spring Farm, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf