Dairy Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 903
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $43,117,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | S & M Dairy Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $262,228 |
42 | David Leavine | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $260,581 |
43 | Te Voortwis Dairy LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $254,877 |
44 | Gary R Nugent | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $245,973 |
45 | Scharrer Dairy LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $241,973 |
46 | Peyerk Brothers Dairy LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $227,334 |
47 | Parisville Dairy LLC | Ruth, MI 48470 | $226,573 |
48 | Michael James Rutkowski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $225,049 |
49 | Gerardus Vanderham | Applegate, MI 48401 | $221,767 |
50 | Neal L Laeder | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $221,342 |
51 | Hwr Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $218,370 |
52 | Goma Dairy Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $216,425 |
53 | Bobbie G Parr Revocable Trust | Brown City, MI 48416 | $214,784 |
54 | Henry Ziel Jr | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $213,343 |
55 | Alfred C Stuever | Lynn, MI 48097 | $213,114 |
56 | Schultz Dairy LLC | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $211,963 |
57 | Kenneth James Weber | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $211,835 |
58 | Dwight Radloff | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $207,486 |
59 | Lawrence J Siemen | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $206,388 |
60 | John C Richmond & Sons Dairy Farms LLC | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $203,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”