Dairy Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $6,523,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $267,585 |
| 2 | Cousin Dairy Farm LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $127,173 |
| 3 | Dekker Dairy Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $121,548 |
| 4 | D & P Dairy LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $121,548 |
| 5 | Lamb Dairy Farm | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $121,548 |
| 6 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $121,548 |
| 7 | Darrin Siemen | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $121,548 |
| 8 | Reid Dairy Farm LLC | Grant Twp, MI 48032 | $121,548 |
| 9 | Oak River Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $121,548 |
| 10 | Palms Boys LLC | Palms, MI 48465 | $121,547 |
| 11 | Rose Valley Dairy LLC | Filion, MI 48432 | $121,545 |
| 12 | Rutkowski Farms Inc | Ubly, MI 48475 | $121,356 |
| 13 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $121,166 |
| 14 | Dynasty Dairy LLC | Ruth, MI 48470 | $121,154 |
| 15 | Highland Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $120,508 |
| 16 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $113,271 |
| 17 | Cumper Dairy Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $113,008 |
| 18 | Sharrard Farms LLC | Peck, MI 48466 | $113,008 |
| 19 | Noll Dairy Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $113,008 |
| 20 | Jake Zwemmer | Elkton, MI 48731 | $113,008 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf