Dairy Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $1,700,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $343,364 |
| 2 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $25,404 |
| 3 | Goma Dairy Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $25,404 |
| 4 | Rose Valley Dairy LLC | Filion, MI 48432 | $25,404 |
| 5 | Lamb Dairy Farm | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $25,404 |
| 6 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $25,404 |
| 7 | Palms Boys LLC | Palms, MI 48465 | $25,404 |
| 8 | Cousin Dairy Farm LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $25,404 |
| 9 | Rutkowski Farms Inc | Ubly, MI 48475 | $25,264 |
| 10 | Noll Dairy Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $23,705 |
| 11 | Van Vliet Dairy LLC | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $23,306 |
| 12 | Sharrard Farms LLC | Peck, MI 48466 | $22,056 |
| 13 | Reid Dairy Farm LLC | Grant Twp, MI 48032 | $21,686 |
| 14 | Dekker Dairy Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $19,779 |
| 15 | Darrin Siemen | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $19,779 |
| 16 | D & P Dairy LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $19,779 |
| 17 | Oak River Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $19,779 |
| 18 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $19,397 |
| 19 | Dynasty Dairy LLC | Ruth, MI 48470 | $19,385 |
| 20 | Cumper Dairy Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $19,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf