Dairy Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 103
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $747,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Matthew Learman | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $1,795 |
82 | Loren Mazure | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $1,640 |
83 | Dynasty Dairy LLC | Ruth, MI 48470 | $1,594 |
84 | Jeffrey M Wolschlager | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,567 |
85 | Frank C Wolschlager | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,567 |
86 | James Bolday | Emmett, MI 48022 | $1,523 |
87 | Sharrard Farms LLC | Peck, MI 48466 | $1,415 |
88 | Kenneth Nielsen | Marlette, MI 48453 | $1,313 |
89 | David Shoemaker Jr | Marlette, MI 48453 | $1,279 |
90 | Kevin M Peruski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $1,225 |
91 | Raymond L Zimmerman | Snover, MI 48472 | $1,166 |
92 | Dennis Schroeder | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $977 |
93 | Sadowy Farms | Applegate, MI 48401 | $808 |
94 | Patrick J Bolday | Emmett, MI 48022 | $761 |
95 | Edward Bolday | Emmett, MI 48022 | $761 |
96 | Gary L Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $707 |
97 | Deann Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $707 |
98 | Daniel J Van Erp | Ubly, MI 48475 | $542 |
99 | Darrin Wolschleger | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $487 |
100 | Daryl Wolschleger | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $487 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”