Farm Subsidy information
10th District of Michigan
(Rep. Paul Mitchell)
Total Subsidies in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,837
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $97,671,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Jay D Ferguson | Lynn, MI 48097 | $297,095 |
| 42 | Christopher M Osentoski | Cass City, MI 48726 | $294,711 |
| 43 | Depcinski Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $294,447 |
| 44 | Nicholas Randall Dhyse | Kinde, MI 48445 | $289,493 |
| 45 | Loren Wayne Iseler | Peck, MI 48466 | $286,908 |
| 46 | Schuette Farms | Elkton, MI 48731 | $283,297 |
| 47 | Cardinal Dairy LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $281,557 |
| 48 | Kevin M Peruski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $276,245 |
| 49 | Clear Creek Farms Inc. | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $273,659 |
| 50 | Atwater Farms Inc | Ubly, MI 48475 | $272,942 |
| 51 | Shupe Dairy Inc | Elkton, MI 48731 | $270,462 |
| 52 | Kundinger Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $266,420 |
| 53 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $265,967 |
| 54 | Hass Feed Lot LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $264,971 |
| 55 | Little-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $259,944 |
| 56 | Gary L Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $259,124 |
| 57 | Deann Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $259,124 |
| 58 | Helena Cattle Company LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $255,751 |
| 59 | Helena Farms LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $255,751 |
| 60 | Grout Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $255,368 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf