Conservation Reserve Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 765
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $2,756,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David George Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $49,999 |
| 2 | Gremel Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $49,668 |
| 3 | Douglas Krohn | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $42,126 |
| 4 | William J Iseler | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $41,868 |
| 5 | Deyanne Price | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $35,658 |
| 6 | Bertha Dondineau | Kinde, MI 48445 | $34,409 |
| 7 | Richard Mcdonald | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $31,884 |
| 8 | Craig Rieman | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $31,725 |
| 9 | Duane Rieman | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $26,581 |
| 10 | Josephine F. Korleski Trust | Sterling Heights, MI 48313 | $23,983 |
| 11 | Kretzschmer Brothers | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $23,516 |
| 12 | Robert Jimkoski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $22,900 |
| 13 | William Potter | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $22,896 |
| 14 | Linda M Gembarski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $22,272 |
| 15 | Scott Krohn | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $21,356 |
| 16 | Ivernia Schwartz | Gagetown, MI 48735 | $19,966 |
| 17 | Joan H. Koroleski Irrev Trust | Allen Park, MI 48101 | $18,674 |
| 18 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $18,663 |
| 19 | Conrad Vigenski | Filion, MI 48432 | $18,438 |
| 20 | Rob Scott | Ada, MI 49301 | $18,264 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf