Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,103

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $51,935,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
41Jones Farms PartnershipLake Crystal, MN 56055$67,953
42Pinedale FarmsWaseca, MN 56093$67,861
43Epland Brothers PartnershipTwin Lakes, MN 56089$65,895
44S.s. Farms Of Freeborn County, Inc.Albert Lea, MN 56007$65,843
45Bottem Farms IncSaint James, MN 56081$63,522
46Richard A GaalswykSaint Peter, MN 56082$61,072
47Johnsons Rolling Acres PartnershipPeterson, MN 55962$60,738
48Chad JohnsonEllendale, MN 56026$60,688
49Tlg Farm PartnershipLake Crystal, MN 56055$60,223
50Matthew Douglas CarpenterGrand Meadow, MN 55936$60,196
51Jason L HollundWells, MN 56097$59,876
52Richard Norbert SchultzNew Richland, MN 56072$59,211
53Blue Valley Sod Of Winnebago IncWinnebago, MN 56098$59,059
54Randy Nelson Farms IncSherburn, MN 56171$58,921
55Jack MayMankato, MN 56001$58,837
56Gehling Legacy FarmsGrand Meadow, MN 55936$58,810
57Omodt & Jorde FarmsRushford, MN 55971$56,988
58Brian H LoefflerJanesville, MN 56048$56,406
59Brice HansonFrost, MN 56033$55,709
60Ufer Farms PartnershipTruman, MN 56088$55,290

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag