Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,585
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $184,509,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thome Family Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $860,924 |
| 2 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $750,000 |
| 3 | Schwieger Hogs Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $750,000 |
| 4 | Flagship Pork Finishers Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $723,695 |
| 5 | F&h Partnership Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $645,886 |
| 6 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $625,000 |
| 7 | Johnsons Rolling Acres Partnership | Peterson, MN 55962 | $601,206 |
| 8 | Lantz Enterprises Inc | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $569,037 |
| 9 | Jc Bushlack Llp | Wells, MN 56097 | $537,500 |
| 10 | Central Fillmore Foods | Harmony, MN 55939 | $528,747 |
| 11 | Tower View Pork LLC | Saint James, MN 56081 | $512,026 |
| 12 | Lukes Bros Inc | Glenville, MN 56036 | $500,000 |
| 13 | Ba Operations LLC | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $500,000 |
| 14 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $476,402 |
| 15 | Jax Dairy Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $471,806 |
| 16 | S & H Farms Partnership | Mankato, MN 56001 | $464,081 |
| 17 | Drager Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $455,507 |
| 18 | Mensink Farms LLC | Preston, MN 55965 | $452,273 |
| 19 | Flagship Pork Partner Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $451,559 |
| 20 | Rahn Farms Inc | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $445,566 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf