Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,641
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $186,641,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David John Schultz | Janesville, MN 56048 | $250,000 |
62 | Gary Angell | Elkton, MN 55933 | $250,000 |
63 | Richard Raimann | Wells, MN 56097 | $250,000 |
64 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $250,000 |
65 | Mike Brandts | Saint James, MN 56081 | $250,000 |
66 | Bruce Stanton | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $250,000 |
67 | Mulhern Dairy L L P | Fountain, MN 55935 | $250,000 |
68 | Koch Dairy Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $250,000 |
69 | Jane Lofgren-brandts | Saint James, MN 56081 | $250,000 |
70 | Robin Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $250,000 |
71 | Derek Joseph Clement | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $250,000 |
72 | Leading Edge Pork Of Bricelyn LLC | Bricelyn, MN 56014 | $250,000 |
73 | Heidi Jean Stevermer | Easton, MN 56025 | $250,000 |
74 | Fair Creek, Llp | Adams, MN 55909 | $250,000 |
75 | 1892 Farms Llp | Truman, MN 56088 | $250,000 |
76 | Ryan Strobel | Eagle Lake, MN 56024 | $250,000 |
77 | Strategic Pork Solutions LLC | Wells, MN 56097 | $250,000 |
78 | Michelle A Angell | Elkton, MN 55933 | $250,000 |
79 | Michelle Ann Schultz | Janesville, MN 56048 | $250,000 |
80 | Elizabeth A Coleman | Saint James, MN 56081 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”