Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,641

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $186,641,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61David John SchultzJanesville, MN 56048$250,000
62Gary AngellElkton, MN 55933$250,000
63Richard RaimannWells, MN 56097$250,000
64Greg John StrobelPemberton, MN 56078$250,000
65Mike BrandtsSaint James, MN 56081$250,000
66Bruce StantonMapleton, MN 56065$250,000
67Mulhern Dairy L L PFountain, MN 55935$250,000
68Koch Dairy IncCaledonia, MN 55921$250,000
69Jane Lofgren-brandtsSaint James, MN 56081$250,000
70Robin StrobelPemberton, MN 56078$250,000
71Derek Joseph ClementSpring Valley, MN 55975$250,000
72Leading Edge Pork Of Bricelyn LLCBricelyn, MN 56014$250,000
73Heidi Jean StevermerEaston, MN 56025$250,000
74Fair Creek, LlpAdams, MN 55909$250,000
751892 Farms LlpTruman, MN 56088$250,000
76Ryan StrobelEagle Lake, MN 56024$250,000
77Strategic Pork Solutions LLCWells, MN 56097$250,000
78Michelle A AngellElkton, MN 55933$250,000
79Michelle Ann SchultzJanesville, MN 56048$250,000
80Elizabeth A ColemanSaint James, MN 56081$250,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag