Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 5,641

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $186,641,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
81Omodt & Jorde FarmsRushford, MN 55971$249,523
82Frank Family Farms LLCDexter, MN 55926$248,921
83Lacey C FieldsMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$246,666
84Trailside Holsteins LLCFountain, MN 55935$245,742
85Wiebke Feedlot LLCSpring Grove, MN 55974$244,430
86Goodrich Farms LlpEaston, MN 56025$243,400
87Oudekirk Bros PartnershipElkton, MN 55933$243,026
88Nielsen Farms Of Albert Lea, LLCAlbert Lea, MN 56007$239,831
89Unke Pork IncFairmont, MN 56031$238,000
90Loren Leslie SchoenrockNew Richland, MN 56072$236,202
91Tyler M FieldsMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$236,132
92Brian RedigWells, MN 56097$235,525
93North Prairie Farms LLCRushford, MN 55971$235,245
94Kevin K RemundMorristown, MN 55052$232,093
95Bottem Farms IncSaint James, MN 56081$230,226
96Michael BeckerBlue Earth, MN 56013$226,850
97Burke FarmsJanesville, MN 56048$223,314
98Mensink Pork Partners LLCPreston, MN 55965$222,190
99Roger L MatejkaSherburn, MN 56171$221,719
100Staloch Brothers LLCWells, MN 56097$218,196

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag