Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 5,103
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $51,935,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rick Jahn | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $47,549 |
82 | Lori E Krohn | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $47,127 |
83 | Judy Prestegard | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $47,019 |
84 | Morken Farms LLC | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $46,548 |
85 | Timothy G Mohwinkel | Amboy, MN 56010 | $46,433 |
86 | Neubauer Farms LLC | Wells, MN 56097 | $46,355 |
87 | Schwarz Farms Fountain | Fountain, MN 55935 | $45,970 |
88 | Diamond D LLC | Taopi, MN 55977 | $45,673 |
89 | Keith James Greier | Lewisville, MN 56060 | $45,627 |
90 | Loren Lair | Hayward, MN 56043 | $45,550 |
91 | Gary Dannhoff | Mankato, MN 56001 | $45,437 |
92 | Roberts Farms Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $45,290 |
93 | Steve Merkel | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $45,270 |
94 | Esb Farm Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $44,920 |
95 | Thompson Land & Livestock LLC | Harmony, MN 55939 | $44,886 |
96 | David Pettersen | Madelia, MN 56062 | $44,749 |
97 | Todd M Fenske | Bricelyn, MN 56014 | $44,600 |
98 | Geistfeld Bros Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $44,158 |
99 | Hanson Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $44,021 |
100 | Calvin Louis Bremer | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $43,889 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”