Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,700
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $338,324,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $1,556,754 |
| 2 | Schwieger Hogs Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $1,544,964 |
| 3 | Flagship Pork Finishers Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $1,531,612 |
| 4 | Johnsons Rolling Acres Partnership | Peterson, MN 55962 | $1,492,804 |
| 5 | Thome Family Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,424,012 |
| 6 | F&h Partnership Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $1,412,585 |
| 7 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $1,375,000 |
| 8 | Flagship Pork Partner Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $1,264,594 |
| 9 | Drager Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $1,211,376 |
| 10 | Central Fillmore Foods | Harmony, MN 55939 | $1,170,762 |
| 11 | Jax Dairy Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,144,266 |
| 12 | Lantz Enterprises Inc | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $1,132,407 |
| 13 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,098,251 |
| 14 | Pioneer Bank ** | Saint James, MN 56081 | $1,075,259 |
| 15 | Woodville Pork Inc | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,072,023 |
| 16 | Jc Bushlack Llp | Wells, MN 56097 | $1,037,500 |
| 17 | Rahn Farms Inc | Good Thunder, MN 56037 | $1,037,227 |
| 18 | Lukes Bros Inc | Glenville, MN 56036 | $1,020,156 |
| 19 | Windmill Farm Usa Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $966,836 |
| 20 | Mensink Farms LLC | Preston, MN 55965 | $961,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf