Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 10,843
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $55,605,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $364,010 |
| 2 | Border State Bank ** | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $173,511 |
| 3 | Bjornstad-east Farm Jv | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $118,366 |
| 4 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $82,555 |
| 5 | John M Peter J & Steven F Thompson Whiskey Creek F | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $78,732 |
| 6 | American Federal Bank ** | Fosston, MN 56542 | $75,902 |
| 7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $69,492 |
| 8 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $67,318 |
| 9 | Tom Fridgen | Farwell, MN 56327 | $64,108 |
| 10 | Four K Farms Ptshp | Morris, MN 56267 | $62,303 |
| 11 | Curtis Tieman | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $61,912 |
| 12 | Marshall County State Bank | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $58,825 |
| 13 | Freilinger Farms Partnership | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $55,790 |
| 14 | Ruth Haagenson | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $55,685 |
| 15 | State Bank Of Taunton ** | Taunton, MN 56291 | $54,439 |
| 16 | Joseph Langan | Danvers, MN 56231 | $51,825 |
| 17 | Janine Schmidt | Dumont, MN 56236 | $50,000 |
| 18 | Catherine Van Leeuwe Rev Trust | Ghent, MN 56239 | $50,000 |
| 19 | Randy M Van Leeuwe | Ghent, MN 56239 | $50,000 |
| 20 | Timothy Prestebak | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf