Biomass Crop Assistance Program in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $2,565,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carlson Timber Products, Inc. | Sandstone, MN 55072 | $892,662 |
2 | Greg Cook Logging Inc | Bigfork, MN 56628 | $249,916 |
3 | Scheff Logging & Trucking Inc | Marcell, MN 56657 | $244,387 |
4 | Fletcher Trucking And Leasing | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $241,978 |
5 | M & R Chips Inc | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $183,749 |
6 | J & A Logging Inc | Effie, MN 56639 | $165,282 |
7 | Palmer Logging | Barnum, MN 55707 | $113,710 |
8 | Krueger Dirtwerx Inc | Mahtowa, MN 55707 | $76,365 |
9 | Rajala Timber Company | Deer River, MN 56636 | $67,015 |
10 | Clifford R Shermer Dba Shermer Lo | Gheen, MN 55771 | $65,948 |
11 | Salmela Logging | Moose Lake, MN 55767 | $64,118 |
12 | J & A Logging Of Wright | Wright, MN 55798 | $46,924 |
13 | Berthiaume Logging LLC | Cloquet, MN 55720 | $45,060 |
14 | Birchem Logging Inc | Mountain Iron, MN 55768 | $43,126 |
15 | Banick Logging Inc | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $29,537 |
16 | Rajala Mill Company | Bigfork, MN 56628 | $13,290 |
17 | Duane Hill | Bovey, MN 55709 | $10,951 |
18 | Lonza Inc | Cohasset, MN 55721 | $10,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”