Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 150

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $1,257,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2021
1Fond Du Lac Res Business CommCloquet, MN 55720$176,342
2Scott W WalbridgeHinckley, MN 55037$49,995
3Roger A NelsonHinckley, MN 55037$46,009
4Jonathan D HacklerGrasston, MN 55030$45,000
5Scott HippenBrook Park, MN 55007$39,975
6David KarasPine City, MN 55063$37,500
7Duane J LaveauWrenshall, MN 55797$36,249
8Grand Portage Indian BandGrand Portage, MN 55605$31,199
9Herbert SikkinkHinckley, MN 55037$30,954
10Roger H TeichPine City, MN 55063$29,661
11Anthony ShedaWrenshall, MN 55797$28,879
12Thunderbrook Beef RanchHinckley, MN 55037$26,414
13Charles R IsaacsDeer River, MN 56636$23,473
14Howard V HongNorthfield, MN 55057$21,067
15Richard CurrieHinckley, MN 55037$20,461
16Richard HendrieCedar Key, FL 32625$19,408
17Ervin R Stevens JrRush City, MN 55069$18,840
18Ebnet Brothers DairyAitkin, MN 56431$18,643
19Leonard KoeringFort Ripley, MN 56449$18,589
20John LawrenceOgilvie, MN 56358$18,416

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag