Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 788
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer) totaled $2,360,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alfred James Brandt | Linn, MO 65051 | $99,206 |
| 2 | Locks Mill, LLC | Loose Creek, MO 65054 | $82,249 |
| 3 | Kent Albert Kuschel | Chamois, MO 65024 | $51,776 |
| 4 | Paulsmeyer Farms Inc | Chamois, MO 65024 | $42,889 |
| 5 | James R Hurst | Meta, MO 65058 | $37,808 |
| 6 | Alan J Wansing | Meta, MO 65058 | $32,282 |
| 7 | Russell J Kremer | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $31,717 |
| 8 | Thomas L Hurst | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $28,134 |
| 9 | Pine Valley Farms LLC | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $26,314 |
| 10 | Wes Backes | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $26,179 |
| 11 | Karl Reuben Kuschel | Chamois, MO 65024 | $25,061 |
| 12 | Jeremy Hecktor | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $25,039 |
| 13 | L & S Farms LLC | Westphalia, MO 65085 | $24,762 |
| 14 | Deeken Farms | Linn, MO 65051 | $24,432 |
| 15 | Douglas Arthur Lieneke | Morrison, MO 65061 | $23,576 |
| 16 | Sean Hackmann | Chamois, MO 65024 | $22,816 |
| 17 | Carl David Troesser | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $21,866 |
| 18 | David Edward Troesser | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $21,782 |
| 19 | Dudenhoeffer Turkey Farm | Linn, MO 65051 | $17,929 |
| 20 | Glen Alan Henneke | Linn, MO 65051 | $17,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf