Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 997
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $4,407,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David Thomas | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $13,496 |
62 | Sandra K Beckman | Newburgh, IN 47630 | $13,440 |
63 | Jan Mcferron | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $13,407 |
64 | Steven Glen Johnson | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $13,348 |
65 | Elakco Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $13,137 |
66 | Paul R Pohlman | Perryville, MO 63775 | $13,113 |
67 | Shawn R Glastetter | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $13,055 |
68 | Charles M Moore Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $12,989 |
69 | Byron Wright | Advance, MO 63730 | $12,889 |
70 | Sharon Crisel | Puxico, MO 63960 | $12,887 |
71 | Slusher Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $12,880 |
72 | Steven Allen Minner | Morley, MO 63767 | $12,665 |
73 | Larry Gene Strobel | Bell City, MO 63735 | $12,608 |
74 | James Pollock Jr | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,605 |
75 | Gst - Exempt Tr Fbo Charles M Moore U/a Dorothy Ma | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $12,573 |
76 | Doris Ann Hedspeth | Puxico, MO 63960 | $12,521 |
77 | Don Rodgers | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $12,504 |
78 | Earl Bullington | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $12,451 |
79 | Robert Gosche | Benton, MO 63736 | $12,345 |
80 | Nesler Farms Holdings LLC | Mayfield, KY 42066 | $12,310 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”