Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,104
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $4,110,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Larry E Hanner | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $8,025 |
142 | Terry Mallett - Mallett Family Farms Rev Liv Trust | Malden, MO 63863 | $7,983 |
143 | Gary Busenbark | Park Hills, MO 63601 | $7,904 |
144 | Lawrence E Dockins | Oran, MO 63771 | $7,855 |
145 | Mathis Family Trust-b | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $7,808 |
146 | Michael Tomlin | Jackson, MO 63755 | $7,774 |
147 | Lloyd F Stoner | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,701 |
148 | Paul Edward Dugger | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,691 |
149 | Kenneth W Anderson | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,642 |
150 | Marilyn R Diebold | Saint Louis, MO 63128 | $7,632 |
151 | Charles M Moore Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,600 |
152 | G A Eftink LLC | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $7,592 |
153 | Rosemary Debrock | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $7,538 |
154 | E E Volz | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $7,488 |
155 | Ddab Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $7,477 |
156 | Jimmy And Brandi Farms, LLC | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $7,457 |
157 | Doris F Douglas | Jackson, MO 63755 | $7,445 |
158 | Deerfield Acres LLC | Perryville, MO 63775 | $7,415 |
159 | Grant Weathers | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,399 |
160 | Jean Ward | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $7,307 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”