Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,910

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $124,848,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
1Bock Bros TimberCharleston, MO 63834$1,398,776
2Keith HancockPuxico, MO 63960$1,017,379
3Kohlfeld Farm TrustCape Girardeau, MO 63702$700,373
4Carl & Fern Rehm FarmsAdvance, MO 63730$574,397
5Kevin StubenrauchBell City, MO 63735$569,111
6Elakco FarmsPortageville, MO 63873$544,877
7Friedrich Farms IncJackson, MO 63755$506,165
8Richard A Martin Md Rev Tr - Richard A Martin MdCape Girardeau, MO 63701$492,009
9Thomas Franklin DawsonBernie, MO 63822$489,446
10Lewis Riley TrustLilbourn, MO 63862$488,227
11Arthur - Arthur Smit B SmithFriedheim, MO 63747$484,081
12Heartland Potato FarmBenton, MO 63736$482,475
13Leo Loehnig- Leo W Loehnig Revocable Living TrustSaint Louis, MO 63128$456,718
14Kirby R & Deborah S Grantham Joint Rev TrustOak Ridge, MO 63769$446,118
15G Wendell WeathersSikeston, MO 63801$445,923
16Wolfhole IncSikeston, MO 63801$438,654
17Edward EubanksDexter, MO 63841$429,518
18River Front Farms LLCScott City, MO 63780$427,263
19Riley Enterprises IncNew Madrid, MO 63869$414,285
20Northcut Farms IncSikeston, MO 63801$413,587

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag