Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,692

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $26,626,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
61Randy WalkerPotts Camp, MS 38659$90,822
62Mask Farms General PartnershipShannon, MS 38868$90,479
63Ach & SonHolly Springs, MS 38635$90,227
64Eaton Farms PartnershipBooneville, MS 38829$89,567
65Circle C Farms A IncCorinth, MS 38834$89,002
66Dacre Reed MitchellCorinth, MS 38834$87,608
67Williams FarmOlive Branch, MS 38654$87,430
68C & S Skelton Farms LLCAshland, MS 38603$87,200
69James A HuddlestonBooneville, MS 38829$86,608
70Spain Farm IncBooneville, MS 38829$86,097
71Ormon Farms IncHickory Flat, MS 38633$85,306
72David R Bridgeforth Pleasant Hill FarmsOlive Branch, MS 38654$85,233
73Pannell Farms PtrnNew Albany, MS 38652$83,701
74Lamar FrazierNew Albany, MS 38652$83,529
75Holley Farm LLCFulton, MS 38843$83,495
76Atkins FarmsHamilton, MS 39746$83,052
77Ayres Farms IncHickory Flat, MS 38633$82,717
78Holloway FarmsHamilton, MS 39746$82,584
79John B HaysOkolona, MS 38860$82,415
80Little Thailand Farms IINesbit, MS 38651$81,596

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag