Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,204
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $12,445,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | White Farms Ajv | Marks, MS 38646 | $58,778 |
22 | , | $58,345 | |
23 | Bcf-09 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $57,416 |
24 | St Rest Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $56,325 |
25 | B L Lamensdorf Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $54,253 |
26 | James Osborn Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $54,114 |
27 | Shoestring Planting Company | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $53,802 |
28 | Southern Planting Company | Greenville, MS 38703 | $53,013 |
29 | Brushy Lake Farms Of Bolivar Co | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $52,896 |
30 | Pemble Farms Partnership II | Merigold, MS 38759 | $52,011 |
31 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $51,570 |
32 | C & B Farms LLC | Hernando, MS 38632 | $51,037 |
33 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $50,257 |
34 | C C & B Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $49,859 |
35 | O J Sharpe Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $49,216 |
36 | Shelby Farms Partnership | Lyon, MS 38645 | $49,212 |
37 | Home Cypress Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $48,446 |
38 | Lakeside Planting Company | Sidon, MS 38954 | $48,224 |
39 | Terrapin Planting Company | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $48,145 |
40 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $47,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”