Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Mississippi
(Rep. Bennie Thompson)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 20,218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,669,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Campbell Brothers Farm No 2 | Lyon, MS 38645 | $9,027,002 |
62 | Riverfield Farms | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $8,810,597 |
63 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $8,786,454 |
64 | Citizens Bank & Trust Co ** | Marks, MS 38646 | $8,612,655 |
65 | Riverbend Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $8,590,569 |
66 | Cypress Lake Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $8,585,246 |
67 | Crowe & Furr Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $8,526,022 |
68 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $8,433,557 |
69 | Rizzo Farms Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $8,400,090 |
70 | Mitchener Pltg Co | Sumner, MS 38957 | $8,379,921 |
71 | Boone Farms 3 | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $8,376,360 |
72 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $8,327,618 |
73 | Moon Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $8,311,366 |
74 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $8,186,845 |
75 | Parker Bros | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $8,155,405 |
76 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $8,099,269 |
77 | Palasini Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $8,070,323 |
78 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $8,058,884 |
79 | Ray Makamson Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $8,044,641 |
80 | Buck Harris Planting Company | Cruger, MS 38924 | $7,986,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”