Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 20,218

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,669,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
101Killebrew Cotton CoGreenwood, MS 38935$7,002,842
102Reed FarmsMarks, MS 38646$6,950,071
103Matagorda PlantationsLyon, MS 38645$6,940,452
104Hope So FarmsInverness, MS 38753$6,898,575
105Bourbon PlantationLeland, MS 38756$6,863,950
106Martin FarmsAnguilla, MS 38721$6,838,626
107M P FarmsTunica, MS 38676$6,823,958
108Morgan Planting Co PartnershipShaw, MS 38773$6,802,843
109Wood Land Farms PartnershipHollandale, MS 38748$6,784,038
110Jordan Planting CompanyYazoo City, MS 39194$6,769,494
111Hunter Planting CoGrace, MS 38745$6,748,556
112Ganier Planting CompanyHollandale, MS 38748$6,719,284
113Fontenot And FontenotHollandale, MS 38748$6,713,872
114Seward & Harris Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$6,683,534
115Pemble FarmsMerigold, MS 38759$6,658,972
116Norway Farms IIYazoo City, MS 39194$6,616,762
117Ewing Planting CompanyAnguilla, MS 38721$6,609,655
118LakewoodIndianola, MS 38751$6,594,795
119Horseshoe Joint VentureTchula, MS 39169$6,586,681
120Fitts Fitts & Pate IvMoorhead, MS 38761$6,562,707

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag