Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Mississippi
(Rep. Bennie Thompson)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 20,218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,669,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Circle H Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $13,828,012 |
22 | Ritchey Bayou Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $13,448,274 |
23 | Lakeland Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $13,050,825 |
24 | Adron Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $12,974,382 |
25 | Perthshire Farms | Gunnison, MS 38746 | $12,847,781 |
26 | Talley Planting Co | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $12,306,720 |
27 | Morgan Farms | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $12,140,996 |
28 | Fioranelli Brothers Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $11,970,875 |
29 | Hard Cash Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $11,964,269 |
30 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $11,857,205 |
31 | Flautt Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $11,502,425 |
32 | Braswell Enterprises | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $11,475,985 |
33 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $11,434,192 |
34 | Hollingsworth & Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $11,301,354 |
35 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $11,189,646 |
36 | White Farms Ajv | Marks, MS 38646 | $11,143,108 |
37 | Arant Acres | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $10,904,756 |
38 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $10,870,696 |
39 | Anderson Planting Co II | Inverness, MS 38753 | $10,867,000 |
40 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $10,848,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”