Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 20,218

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,669,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Mascot Planting CompanyClarksdale, MS 38614$10,847,781
42Bowdre PlaceRobinsonville, MS 38664$10,824,556
43Berry Farm EnterprisesRobinsonville, MS 38664$10,799,396
44Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$10,654,240
45Opossum Ridge Planting CoHollandale, MS 38748$10,615,402
46C C & B FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$10,482,623
47Carter Plantation LimitedRolling Fork, MS 39159$10,423,251
48Haney FarmingRuleville, MS 38771$10,387,414
49Battle AssociatesTunica, MS 38676$10,320,995
50Simmons Planting CoHollandale, MS 38748$10,108,231
51Massey Planting CompanyLyon, MS 38645$10,052,961
52Grosvenor FarmsHolly Bluff, MS 39088$9,793,270
53Walter Pillow & Sons Planting CoGreenwood, MS 38930$9,770,344
54Little Omega FarmsTchula, MS 39169$9,657,647
55Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$9,598,756
56Tackett FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$9,472,020
57Murrell FarmsAvon, MS 38723$9,328,375
58Omega PlantationsLyon, MS 38645$9,250,886
59Coghlan FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$9,237,801
60Prewitt FarmsBoyle, MS 38730$9,041,827

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag