Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Mississippi
(Rep. Bennie Thompson)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 20,218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,669,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mascot Planting Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $10,847,781 |
42 | Bowdre Place | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $10,824,556 |
43 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $10,799,396 |
44 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $10,654,240 |
45 | Opossum Ridge Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $10,615,402 |
46 | C C & B Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $10,482,623 |
47 | Carter Plantation Limited | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $10,423,251 |
48 | Haney Farming | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $10,387,414 |
49 | Battle Associates | Tunica, MS 38676 | $10,320,995 |
50 | Simmons Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $10,108,231 |
51 | Massey Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $10,052,961 |
52 | Grosvenor Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $9,793,270 |
53 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $9,770,344 |
54 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $9,657,647 |
55 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $9,598,756 |
56 | Tackett Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $9,472,020 |
57 | Murrell Farms | Avon, MS 38723 | $9,328,375 |
58 | Omega Plantations | Lyon, MS 38645 | $9,250,886 |
59 | Coghlan Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $9,237,801 |
60 | Prewitt Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $9,041,827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”