Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,433

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $558,387,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
41Haney FarmingRuleville, MS 38771$1,760,710
42Dixie FarmsVance, MS 38964$1,729,227
43Bare Bones FarmsGreenwood, MS 38930$1,675,065
44Bcf-09Tunica, MS 38676$1,630,817
45Simmons Planting CoHollandale, MS 38748$1,622,096
46Anderson Planting Co IIInverness, MS 38753$1,593,014
47Porter & Porter Farms Partnership IICollierville, TN 38017$1,542,984
48Maxwell FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$1,538,361
49Silent Shade Planting CompanyBelzoni, MS 39038$1,530,083
50Rizzo Farms Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$1,511,100
51Grace Ag PartnershipGreenville, MS 38703$1,489,280
52Ltf IIINesbit, MS 38651$1,482,810
53Boone Farms 3Cleveland, MS 38732$1,417,961
54Carter Plantation LimitedRolling Fork, MS 39159$1,414,776
55Holmes County Bank & Trust Compan **Lexington, MS 39095$1,369,180
56Cypress Brake Planting CompanyTunica, MS 38676$1,355,610
57Bruton Farms PartnershipHollandale, MS 38748$1,354,626
58Michael & John Aguzzi Jr PrtCleveland, MS 38732$1,352,683
59Holly Ridge Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$1,316,049
60Little Omega FarmsTchula, MS 39169$1,315,887

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag