Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,433

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $558,387,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
1Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$21,088,277
2First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$19,612,578
3First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$13,953,134
4Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$11,851,049
5Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$9,924,820
6The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$9,448,607
7Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$8,336,256
8Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$8,316,361
9Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$6,771,028
10State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$6,141,774
11Bankplus **Yazoo City, MS 39194$6,019,852
12Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$5,321,296
13First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$5,054,315
14Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$5,000,015
15Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$3,849,734
16Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$3,782,048
17Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$3,714,707
18Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$3,193,607
19Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$3,147,957
20Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$3,048,014

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag