Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 14,009

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $4,885,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Ritchey Bayou FarmsGreenville, MS 38703$13,409,903
22Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$13,297,996
23Lakeland Planting CompanyHollandale, MS 38748$12,719,247
24Adron FarmsMinter City, MS 38944$12,532,440
25Perthshire FarmsGunnison, MS 38746$12,317,411
26Morgan FarmsCleveland, MS 38732$11,903,127
27Fioranelli Brothers Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$11,515,655
28Hard Cash Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$11,334,173
29Braswell EnterprisesBelzoni, MS 39038$11,292,308
30Makamson Planting CoMorgan City, MS 38946$11,289,277
31Hollingsworth & CompanyHollandale, MS 38748$10,992,730
32Talley Planting CoTutwiler, MS 38963$10,840,976
33G M FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$10,751,257
34Mascot Planting CompanyClarksdale, MS 38614$10,664,716
35Anderson Planting Co IIInverness, MS 38753$10,654,640
36Arant AcresRuleville, MS 38771$10,635,866
37Aguzzi Farms A PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$10,612,180
38Canon FarmsTunica, MS 38676$10,574,739
39Opossum Ridge Planting CoHollandale, MS 38748$10,470,409
40White Farms AjvMarks, MS 38646$10,428,223

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag