Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones), 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,950

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones) totaled $65,600,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2019
1Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$850,024
2Agcarolina Farm Credit **Elizabeth City, NC 27906$676,211
3Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$629,846
4W B Bateman & Sons IncElizabeth City, NC 27909$446,145
5Scattered Acres IncBelhaven, NC 27810$399,649
6Howard FarmsDeep Run, NC 28525$397,198
7French FarmsVanceboro, NC 28586$388,903
8Timothy J CorprewHertford, NC 27944$378,433
9L Edward Winslow IIIElizabeth City, NC 27909$349,066
10Ferebee Iv PartnershipShawboro, NC 27973$334,228
11Cherry Hill Farms IncCamden, NC 27921$322,179
12Layton Farms PartnershipEdenton, NC 27932$315,939
13Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B AndersVanceboro, NC 28586$311,719
14Alston Spruill FarmsOriental, NC 28571$306,968
15Morgan FarmsShawboro, NC 27973$305,180
16Tull Hill Farms IncKinston, NC 28501$291,216
17Cherry & Bateman Farms LLCColumbia, NC 27925$291,192
18Possum Quarter Farms LLCElizabeth City, NC 27909$290,919
19Ernest C Cartwright JrElizabeth City, NC 27909$289,875
20Mann Farms IncFairfield, NC 27826$288,491

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag