Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 922
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $3,240,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $63,737 |
2 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $60,437 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $48,516 |
4 | Michael Dwayne Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $42,849 |
5 | Craven L Register | Clinton, NC 28328 | $35,228 |
6 | Ronnie D Smith | Clinton, NC 28328 | $33,310 |
7 | Cape Fear Farm Credit Aca ** | Clinton, NC 28329 | $31,980 |
8 | Miles Floyd Jackson | Dunn, NC 28334 | $31,889 |
9 | John Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $29,611 |
10 | Blue View Inc | Dunn, NC 28335 | $28,611 |
11 | Savage Farms Inc | Willard, NC 28478 | $28,538 |
12 | Harvey Fertilizer & Gas Co | Kinston, NC 28502 | $28,149 |
13 | Woodrow W Marlowe Jr | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $27,548 |
14 | M & A Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $27,420 |
15 | Wooten Farming & Seed | Currie, NC 28435 | $27,012 |
16 | Andy Pope Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $25,720 |
17 | Rooks Farm Service Inc | Burgaw, NC 28425 | $25,649 |
18 | Carr Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $24,998 |
19 | Ten Mile Farm Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $24,618 |
20 | Hall Brothers Farms Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $24,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>