Direct Payment Program in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,461
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $70,062,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $1,265,455 |
2 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $1,164,528 |
3 | Strickland Farming Partnership | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $721,595 |
4 | G & R Farms Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $572,546 |
5 | Carr Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $556,112 |
6 | Millstream Farms Partnership | Dunn, NC 28334 | $541,580 |
7 | Savage Farms Inc | Willard, NC 28478 | $453,007 |
8 | Wooten Farming & Seed | Currie, NC 28435 | $422,786 |
9 | Samuel J Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $359,289 |
10 | Byrdfield Farms Inc | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $357,071 |
11 | King Farming Enterprises LLC | Ash, NC 28420 | $351,294 |
12 | John C Melvin | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $343,740 |
13 | Mcpherson Bros Farm Inc | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $336,776 |
14 | Jesse Wooten Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $329,188 |
15 | Hudson Farms | Turkey, NC 28393 | $328,738 |
16 | Howard Cotton Farms | Autryville, NC 28318 | $324,409 |
17 | Rooks Farm Service Inc | Burgaw, NC 28425 | $322,580 |
18 | John Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $310,464 |
19 | Miles Floyd Jackson | Dunn, NC 28334 | $309,306 |
20 | Joseph Jacob Ward Jr | Council, NC 28434 | $306,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>