Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 363
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $2,059,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carmichael Farms LLC | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $71,379 |
2 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $64,683 |
3 | Juniper Land Co | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $60,688 |
4 | Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $59,416 |
5 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $55,011 |
6 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $54,743 |
7 | Hendrix Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $49,577 |
8 | Nick Evans Farms | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $47,758 |
9 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $44,885 |
10 | Harvey Z Edge Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $41,013 |
11 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $40,894 |
12 | Elrod Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $40,769 |
13 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $40,104 |
14 | William P Carmichael | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $40,075 |
15 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $39,018 |
16 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $38,890 |
17 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $38,293 |
18 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $37,946 |
19 | Rockdale Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $36,288 |
20 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $34,503 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>